In Defense of Innocence
By Zaynab Harith
“Disgusting and Reprehensible” said Hillary Clinton when
referring to the YouTube clip “Innocence of Muslims” “We absolutely reject its content and
message” she added. “The future must not belong to those who
slander the prophet of Islam” Obama told the United Nations. “Innocence of Muslims is a stupid hate
film” wrote numerous bloggers.
Nakoula the author of the movie now sits in an American jail. In countries all over the Muslim world
there have been riots protesting Nakoula’s movie. Pakistani Government minister Ghulam Ahmad
Bilour put a $100,000 bounty on Nakoula’s head. An
Egyptian Muslim cleric has called on American Muslim youth to
kill Nakoula, and everyone involved in
the video, including actors,
actresses and anyone who has promoted
Innocence of
Muslims. Americans Muslims have
threatened to chop off
Nakoula’s head. Richard Gere
told journalists he was
open to shooting any movie that helped present Muslims in a more positive
light.
Did Nakoula’s
movie slander the prophet of Islam or did he tell the truth about Muhammad? This movie is difficult to get hold of
but if we don’t live in countries where the trailer has been banned such as
India and Russia, we can examine the trailer
in order
to answer this question.
The trailer
starts with a constable telling a doctor “our
prophet had 61 wives and 11 at the same time.” According to Islamic texts not only did
Muhammad have many wives and concubines but in some cases he or his followers
had killed
their husbands.
The
trailer continues with the doctor telling his daughter to close the clinic
because of an angry mob on the street.
Muslim
mobs have attacked Christians throughout the Middle East but have they attacked
hospitals? A good place to find the answer is the
religion of
peace web site. A recent example of an attack on a
hospital took place in Iraq on January 15, 2011. Muslim attacks on hospitals are not
restricted to the Middle East.
Raphael
Israeli wrote:
"In
2004, there were 145 attacks in hospitals in France, rising to more than 200 in
2006 in which medical staff had been attacked by Muslims." A story in Le Figaro
this year maintains that French hospital personnel are becoming "more and more
victims of violence," citing a report from the health ministry agency
responsible for keeping track of violence in healthcare facilities.
In
the movie trailer the police arrive at the medical clinic and the master
sergeant says “Freeze, do not take any action until everything is over.”
Lack
of Muslim police intervention when Christians are attacked has been going on for
years. In one incident on 31 May 2008,
a Muslim mob attacked the Coptic Monastery of Saint Fana and kidnapped and tortured
monks. The police arrived several
hours after being informed of the attack even though they were located only 6 km
away.
In
the trailer the doctor tells his daughter “The Islamic Egyptian Police arrested
1,400 Christians, tortured them and forced them to confess to killings”.
Videos
of Egyptian police attacking and arresting Christians have been posted
on the internet. The Egyptian military attacks Copts as well. When after a series of brutal attacks
against Christians, Christian activists marched to the state-run TV station in
Cairo, chanting and demanding reforms, military “Security” forces mowed down
hundreds of Christian protesters with guns and tanks, killing dozens and
injuring hundreds more.
Hundreds of thousands of Copts have already been forced to
flee their homes.
Nigerian lawyer and activist
Emmanuel Ogebe, after describing the carnage of
thousands of Christians at the hands of Muslim militants at Coptic
Solidarity’s third annual conference in
Washington D.C on July 2012, lamented that
Obama’s response was to pressure the Nigerian president to make more
concessions, including the creation of more mosques (the very places that
“radicalize” Muslims against “infidel” Christians). According to the Obama
administration the slaughter of Christians by Muslims is not a religious
conflict. In fact, instead of protecting the
Christians, the Obama administration has launched a 600 million dollar
initiative to find the true causes of the slaughter of Christians. Was it
reprehensible of Nakoula to point out the plight of the Copts in his movie or is
spending 600 million American tax payer dollars to find the “true” causes while
Christians are being murdered and the American economy is going bankrupt,
heartless, disgusting and reprehensible?
Is it reprehensible to speak the truth about Islam or to suppress
the truth the way the Obama administration has done by
purging texts that Muslims might find offensive
from FBI and government training manuals? Was it reprehensible for
Lieutenant Colonel Dooley to teach a course on Islamic radicalism or for
President Barack Obama's Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin
Dempsey to fire him for doing so. Why is a man who warns about Islam fired
while a Muslim psychiatrist Nidal Hasan, who gave speeches to his fellow psychiatrists how
non-believers will go to hell, was not fired until he opened fire on his fellow
soldiers.
In
the trailer the Doctor says to his daughter Marina: “Man plus X equals Islamic Terrorist.
Islamic Terrorist minus X equals man.”
His daughter than asks him “But what is X?”
Both
the Bush and the Obama administrations have told us that Islam is a religion of peace and
that the only reason there are Islamic terrorists is because Islam has been
hijacked by a few extremists. The
doctor in the movie is telling us that, this is not the case and that Islam
changes people into Islamic terrorists.
If Islam is a hijacked religion of peace then once the chief hijacker,
Osama was killed one would expect the Muslim masses would revert to their
peaceful selves. If Islam creates
the Osama’s of the world than we would expect what we have recently seen, riots
in which thousands of Muslims in Egypt , Tunisia ,
Qatar and other
countries chanted “We are all Osama”.
In
the next scene in the trailer the topic shifts to the life of Muhammad. Two men discuss hiding the disgrace that
Muhammad was born of an unknown father.
This
scene is based on the fact that Muslims believe that Abdallah was Muhammad’s father but Muhammad was the wrong
age to have been Abdallah’s son since Muhammad was 2
and Abdallah had died six years previously.
In a
later scene in the movie Muhammad’s wife Khadijah
orders him
to sit on her lap and in different positions until he no longer sees the
devil.
This scene makes fun of a story in Ibn Ishaq’s book, The Life of Muhammad
in which Kadijah did a test to see if the spirit who came to
Muhammad was an angel or the devil.
According to Ibn Ishaq the author of Sirat Rasul Allah the biography of
Muhammad, she told Muhammad to sit on her lap and then disclosed her form and
asked if Muhammad could still see the spirit. When he said no she said that the spirit
must be an angel and not the devil.
In the next episode
in the movie Khadijah’s cousin says he will help Muhammad. He says “I will make a book for him. He
said he would mix verses from the Torah and the New Testament with false
verses.” The cousin dies and
Muhammad is upset because he’s lost his inspiration.
This scene is
dealing with the question of where the Koran came from. Whoever wrote the Koran had some
familiarity with Christian and Jewish doctrine. The Biblical
scholar Dr.
Robert M. Price
wrote:
"The Koran was assembled from a variety of
prior Hagarene texts … in order to provide the
Moses-like Muhammad with a Torah of his own...."
Even Islamic texts even quote al-Nadr a person who did not believe in Islam as saying
regarding Muhammad “ He is spouting ancient legends
that he has gathered from the mouths of men more learned than he."
The movie
suggests that Khadijah‘s cousin Waraqa bin Naufil may have been the learned
source of Islamic doctrine. Waraqa
had been converted to Christianity in the Pre-Islamic Period and used to write
about the Gospel in Arabic.
According to Islamic texts when Waraqa died the Divine Inspiration was
paused for a while so that Allah's Apostle was very much grieved.
In
the next scene Waraqa tells Muhammad to kill the men and capture the
women, loot and sell the children in the next raid.
According
to the Koran, Muhammad started his military career by launching raids against
the Quraysh and looting their caravans. Two months after
his first successful raid Muhammad led over 300 men against a large Meccan caravan which was making its way home from Syria.
Muhammad told
his followers:
"It is likely
that Allah may give it to you as booty." (Ibn Sa'd, Vol. II, 9.)
Notice that he
made its God will to attack and steal and kill. Muhammad also permitted his men to take all
the infidel women that they could capture, as concubines (Koran 4:3)
except the ones he wanted for himself.
In the next scene the master tells a married woman to wait for him in her
tent. A girl asks “Isn’t
it shameful for a woman to expose herself
to a man she does not know?” and the master answers that “Have you not heard
what God has said in the Quran. The Master may desire whom he wants and shall be
given whom he wants.”
This is consistent
with Koran which states (33:50):
O Prophet! surely We have made lawful to you your wives
whom you have given their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses out
of those whom Allah has given to you as prisoners of war, and the daughters of
your paternal uncles and the daughters of your paternal aunts, and the daughters
of your maternal uncles and the daughters of your maternal aunts who fled with
you; and a believing woman if she gave herself to the Prophet, if the Prophet
desired to marry her-- specially for you, not for the (rest of)
believers;
According to the
Muslim historian Abu Ja'far Muhammad bin Jarir al-Tabari (839-923), one of
Muhammad's many sons, Zayad married a beautiful wife by the name of Zaynab and
Muhammad wanted her. One day
Muhammad was talking with Aisha (one of his wives) when "a fainting overcame
him." Then he smiled and asked, "Who will go to Zaynab to tell her the good
news, saying that God has married her to me?" He then recited the revelation
Allah had just given him, scolding him for being concerned about what people
might think and thus refusing to marry Zaynab. (Qur'an
33:37)
Later in the
trailer a shepherd expresses his happiness that his daughter will be marrying 53
year old Mohammad and says “My
daughter shall have the stars.”
According to (Sahih Bukhari 5.236) when Muhammad was 51 years old he married a six year old child, a marriage he consummated when she was 9 years old. Muhammad explained that God wanted him to do so:
"...the Prophet
said to her (Aisha), 'You have been shown to me twice in my dream. I saw you
pictured on a piece of silk and someone said (to me). 'This is your wife.' When
I uncovered the picture, I saw that it was yours. I said, 'If this is from
Allah, it will be done.'"
Many
Muslims are following Muhammad’s example.
This movie “Innocence of Muslims” by exposing the source of this practice
is defending the innocence of children.
Courageous Christians acted to defend the childhood innocence of Muslim
girls with signs saying that Mohammad was a pedophile
that they displayed near a Muslim festival in Dearborn Michigan. The Christians were attacked by Muslims
who hurled rocks at them but instead of arresting the Muslims and protecting the
Christians the police arrested the Christians and Obama praised the Dearborn police! If the message that Mohammad was a
pedophile does not get out than the current situation in which little girls are
being married off to old men will continue in the
Arab world and will come to America as well. Islamic child marriages are already
being arranged in Europe.
In the trailer an
elderly woman says:
My age has exceeded 120 years and in all my young life
‘I haven’t seen such a murderous thug as Muhammad’. He kills men, captures women
and children, robs the caravans, and breaches
agreements and treaties. He sells the children as slaves after he and his men
have used them. And what’s more, he does this all in the name of God. What God
is this that is such an oppressor and so unfair to the people?
Perhaps the most
well known example of
Muhammad engaging in the behavior described by the woman in the movie was his
actions toward the Jewish tribe of the Bani Qurayza. He accused the Jewish tribe of the Bani
Qurayza of wanting to betray him and received a
convenient communication from the angel Gabriel who ordered him to attack
them. He ordered his men to put
them under siege. After 14 days the
Bani Qurayza surrendered. Mohammed killed all their men, and
enslaved their women and children [Saheeh Muslim -
1769]. Ibn Ishaq gave the
details:
The apostle went out to the market of Medina and dug
trenches in it. Then he sent for the men of Qurayzah and struck off their
heads as they were brought out to him in batches until 600 to 700 of them were
dead.
The Jewish women and children were enslaved and Muhammad took one of them, a fifteen year old girl named Rayhana bint Zayd ibn Amr as a personal slave.
In the movie, the
elderly woman who made the above speech is torn apart by camels tied to opposite
ends of her body.
This scene is
based on the murder of Umm Qirfah a leader of the
Fazarah tribe.
According to
Tabari
Vol.8:Page.96:
Allah’s
Messenger sent Zayd to Wadi
Qura, where he encountered the Banu Fazarah. Some of his
companions were killed, and Zayd was carried away
wounded. … After he recovered, Muhammad sent him with an army against the Fazarah settlement. He met them in Qura and inflicted casualties on them and took Umm Qirfah prisoner. ..
Zyad bin Harithah
ordered Qays to kill Umm, and
he killed her cruelly. He tied each of her legs with a rope and tied the ropes
to two camels, and they split her in two.
In the next scene
we
hear:
Let us take the other treasure. Cut off
his arms and his legs and then his head and do it in front of his beautiful wife
Sophia.
Muslim
(laughs)
As
you command Master.
This
is probably based on the story of Safiyya a 17
year old girl of "incomparable beauty" (Ibn Saad,
al-Tabaqat, pp. 120-123) whose husband Kinana knew where the treasure of his tribe was hidden. In order to get Kinana to reveal where the treasure was the Muslims lit a
fire on his chest but Kinana died refusing to reveal
its location. A couple of years
earlier Muhammad killed Safiyya’s father himself. Muhammad forced Safiyya
to be one of his wives and raped
her.
There are modern
day Muslims who are every bit as cruel as Muhammad
was. Taliban gunmen boarded a
school bus and shot fourteen year old Malala Yousafzai
a girl who fought for the right of Pakistani girls to have an education. The Taliban vowed that if she recovers,
they’ll shoot her again. And they won’t stop until she’s dead. A Taliban spokesman
explained:
“She
has become a symbol of Western culture, let this be a
lesson.”
The
lesson that is needed is the lesson in Nakoula’s movie.
The
inescapable conclusion from the above analysis of the movie is that although
there was some literary license taken, the movie’s description
of Mohammad and of a Muslim attack on a Christian medical clinic describe
reality.
In light of the violent response to attempts to tell the truth about
Muhammad and Christian persecution one has to ask oneself not if such an
endeavor is reprehensible but if it is productive. Has it made Muslims question their
religion and become more peaceful or more violent? Given the threat we face from a nuclear
armed Pakistan, and Iran, is it really a good idea to antagonize the Arab world
with a YouTube video? Would it not
be best to restrict free speech so that such videos do not surface
anymore?
I think the violent protests against the film were instigated by
religious leaders who know that their power is threatened by those who promote
disbelief in Islam. I think the
violence is actually evidence that the film is effective. Islamic violence occurs whether we
expose Islam or not. We need to
remember that the attacks of 9/11/2001 happened before Nakoula’s video and that
the terrorist attack on the American embassy in Benghazi that occurred after
Nakoula’s video on 9/11/2012 was carried out on that date to send a message to the United States, not as a
spontaneous expression of rage to a video that had been produced months
before. In the long term there will
be less Islamic violence if we convince Muslims that God does not want them to
engage in Jihad against the infidel.
If we reward Muslim violence
the way Obama did by making speeches that there is no future for those who
slander Islam that will encourage more Muslim violence. If we don’t speak out and more
importantly continue to send billions of dollars to countries that persecute
Christians they will have no incentive to stop persecuting
Christians.
One
of the ways Muslims persecute Copts in Egypt is by stealing their
daughters. There is a tragic movie
called The Passion of the Copts in which a woman cries out for her daughter and
desperate Egyptian Christians plead for help from God. God is not helping them and neither is
America. Obama won’t grant them
asylum. Obama even refused to
discuss the situation with a Coptic leader. A commenter on the Passion movie posted:
“Our women are to be enslaved in Islam, our
men are to be killed and America receives millions of Islamist with open arms
and refuses to give us asylum.”
Pamela Geller wrote:
“U.S. policy regarding refugee
resettlement would shock most Americans if they only knew. The
United Nations picks who gets to come to the U.S. as a refugee. The mandate of
the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) is to determine which of the
world's huddled masses comes to the U.S. as humanitarian refugees. And
predictably, this U.N. body is favoring Muslims. Christians from Muslim lands
are being refused refugee status.”
Tens of thousands of Muslims are immigrating to
the United States every month. Another comment warned about the
consequences of such immigration:
“The suffering of non-Muslims in Muslim countries is
beyond bearing. God help our brother and sister non-Muslims! This and other
terrible horrors will take place in our Western countries if Muslim immigration
is not stopped… “
We only have to look at what happened and
what is happening to
countries where there is large scale Muslim immigration and to watch the video
of Christians being stoned by Muslims in Dearborn to see
the truth in these words.
During the debate between vice president Biden and Senator Ryan, Biden argued that we don’t need to worry about Iran’s enrichment of uranium yet because “they have to be able to have something to put it in.” (a bomb). We need to remember that Pakistan protected Osama from us and that Pakistan has “something to put it in”. If we don’t make an all out effort to convince Muslims that God has not commanded them to wage holy war against us than if Muslim immigration doesn’t get us, the Muslim bomb will.
Links:
An excellent web site about the Islamic basis of the Innocence of Muslims movie titled "Innocence of Muslims Dissected" can be found on the excellent cross muslims blogspot.